What's the difference between a fractional CFO and a controller?
The simplest way to think about it is that a controller looks backward while a CFO looks forward. A controller makes sure the numbers are right. A CFO makes sure you’re making the right decisions with those numbers.
A controller handles the accuracy and integrity of your financial records. They oversee bookkeeping staff, review reconciliations, post adjusting entries for accruals and depreciation, and manage the month-end close process. The end product is reliable financial statements you can trust. If your balance sheet has mystery balances or your income statement doesn’t match reality, that’s a controller problem.
A fractional CFO assumes you already have accurate financials and builds on that foundation. They focus on forecasting, cash flow planning, scenario analysis, and strategic guidance. When you’re evaluating whether to open a second location, take on debt, acquire a competitor, or restructure operations, that’s CFO territory. They translate financial data into decisions about where the business should go.
Many business owners confuse the two because they’ve never had either. They think hiring a CFO will fix their messy books. It won’t. A CFO needs clean numbers to do their job. Asking a CFO to also clean up your accounting is like asking a pilot to also build the airplane. Different skill sets, different purposes.
The question isn’t which one is better. It’s which one you need right now. If you have a bookkeeper but nobody reviewing their work, no month-end close process, and financial statements you don’t trust, you need controller-level oversight first. Get the foundation solid before adding strategic planning on top.
If your books are already accurate and you’re facing decisions about growth, financing, or major investments, a fractional CFO provides the strategic guidance that a controller isn’t positioned to deliver. You might need both, but you need them in the right order.
Some Boca Raton advisory firms offer both services because the line between them isn’t always clean in practice. A good controller spots operational issues while reviewing the numbers. A good CFO catches accounting problems that would throw off their analysis. But understanding the core distinction helps you hire for the right problem instead of expecting one role to do everything.
Premium Controller & CFO Advisory Firm
Next Step:
Let's Talk About Your Business
Tell us about your business and your goals. We'll discuss how Jargo can support your financial operations and growth.
More Questions
What does a fractional CFO do for a small business?
A fractional CFO provides part-time executive financial leadership. They handle forecasting, cash flow planning, financial analysis, and strategic decision support without the cost of a full-time hire.
Read answerHow can a fractional CFO help me secure business financing?
A fractional CFO prepares your financials to meet lender requirements, identifies the right financing options for your situation, and manages the application process. They bring credibility and expertise that improves your chances of approval and better terms.
Read answerHow much does a fractional CFO cost in South Florida?
Fractional CFO services in South Florida typically range from $3,000 to $10,000 per month on retainer, or $200 to $500 per hour for project-based work. The actual cost depends on scope, complexity, and how much time your business requires.
Read answerDo I need a CFO if I already have a bookkeeper?
A bookkeeper and a CFO serve different purposes. Bookkeepers handle the historical record of what happened. A CFO provides forward-looking financial strategy and decision support. Whether you need both depends on your business complexity and growth trajectory.
Read answerWhen should I hire a fractional CFO instead of a full-time CFO?
Fractional CFO support makes sense when you need strategic financial leadership but don't require someone in the office 40 hours a week. Most businesses between $2M and $25M in revenue benefit from fractional support before the complexity justifies a full-time hire.
Read answer